The Court dismissed an application seeking quashing of an injunction order. Petitioner challenged the dismissal of his appeal against a judgment refusing execution of a Sada agreement. Invoking settled principles, the court held that no interference was warranted.
Application for quashing dismissed. No finding on merits provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.165 of 2019
======================================================
Brijendra Mishra @ Birendra Mishra Deomuni Mishra viilage- Barahuli, P.OSonhan, P.S- Sonhan, District- Kaimur at Bhabua
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Pawan Kr. Singh, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 12-09-2023
dated 27.11.2018 passed by the District Judge-Kaimur at Bhabhua in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 09 of 2018.
Agreement.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.165 of 2019(4) dt.12-09-2023 2/2
respondent has been challenged by the petitioner.
same cannot be interfered with.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing of the injunction order dated 27.11.2018 passed in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 09 of 2018 by the District Judge-Kaimur can be interfered with
Brijendra Mishra @ Birendra Mishra Deomuni Mishra
Rajesh Mishra and Others
Sandeep Kumar
Justice
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
