The High Court dismissed an application for quashing an order allowing execution of a decree filed by third parties. The court held the impugned order was not illegal and directed the executing court to enforce the decree within a month.
Application dismissed; direction to executing court to execute decree within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.254 of 2019
======================================================
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.254 of 2019(7) dt.11-09-2023 2/4
with
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No. 1430 of 2018
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No. 254 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Kr Rai (In CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No. 1430 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Kr Rai ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
Re:-Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No.1430 of 2018.
Heard the parties.
Shankar Srivastava seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Shri Dronacharya have no objection in withdrawal of the same.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.254 of 2019(7) dt.11-09-2023 3/4
withdrawn.
Re:-Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No. 254 of 2019.
Heard the parties.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.254 of 2019(7) dt.11-09-2023 4/4
Supreme Court, though, the case has been contested from the year 1991.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court should quash the order dated 13.12.2018 allowing execution of decree under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC filed by non-parties.
Whether the application was filed bona fide or to delay the execution case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lal Mohan Kamti, Nirmala Devi, Ravi Kumar, Amit Kumar, Kabita Devi, Sabita Devi, Ramanand Singh, Doulat Singh, Arvind Kumar Singh, Lalita Devi
Kumar Arvindram @ Mukul Kumar, Shashi Shekharam, Gopal Chandra Das, Hari Das, Sanjay Das, Shiva Das, Panchoo Das, Bangali Das
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
