In First Appeal No.107 of 1999, the appellant failed to appear. The court noted non-compliance with an order dated 21.08.2018. The application was dismissed for default based on counsel's representation of a prior Lok-Adalat settlement.
Application dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No.107 of 1999
======================================================
BALESHWAR SHARMA
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
CANARA BANK,BIHTA BRANCH and ANR
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ratnesh Nandan Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
20 03-01-2023 Non appears for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the Bank is present.
The order dated 21.08.2018 has not been complied.
Learned counsel for the Bank has submitted that he
has filed his counter affidavit and from reading of Annexure-I of the counter affidavit, it appears that the matter has been settled in Lok-Adalat on 09.09.2000 and perhaps, because of this, the appellant has stopped doing Pairavi in this case.
In these circumstances this application is dismissed for default.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/Vikas
U
BALESHWAR SHARMA
CANARA BANK, BIHTA BRANCH
SANDEEP KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
