Sudip Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ application dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner failed to appear on hearing dates despite repeated summons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9910 of 2017
======================================================
Sudip Kumar Singh @ Sudip Kr. Singh S/o Late Jayanti Rai R/o N.M.C.H., Patna Nursing Hostel No. - 3, Hall No. - 2, Agam Kuan, Gulzarbagh, Patna - 7.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mrs.Vijaya Laxmi Srivastava, A.C. to S.C.-23 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
5 12-12-2023
Despite repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner today when the matter is called out. Yesterday i.e. on 11.12.2023 also none had represented the petitioner when the case was called out.
However, learned counsel for the State is present.
In view of the above, this writ application is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudip Kumar Singh @ Sudip Kr. Singh
State Of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court