High Court Quashed D.I.G. Shahabad order infesting bias. Directed D.G.P. to hear petitioner's departmental appeal afresh within three months and communicate result.
Order dated 02.03.2016 set aside; D.G.P. directed to consider appeal afresh within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8762 of 2016
======================================================
Jai Prakash Mishra Son of Late Bhagwan Mishra, Resident of MohallaChandi Asthan Road, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Munger.... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh, Advocate : Mr.Kundan Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar, G.A.-9
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 12-12-2023
Heard Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner assisted by Mr. Kundan Kumar Sinha, learned counsel and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned G.A.-9 for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8762 of 2016 dt.12-12-2023 2/3
Patna High Court CWJC No.8762 of 2016 dt.12-12-2023 3/3
appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and the Director General of Police is required to communicate the said order to the petitioner. If the order is in favour of the petitioner, the consequential benefits shall also be paid within next three months.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
| Nitesh/- | |
|---|---|
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 14.12.2023 |
| Transmission Date | 14.12.2023 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal in the departmental proceeding should be heard by the authority that passed the impugned order?
JAI PRAKASH MISHRA
THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMW
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE SHAHABAD
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BOHOJPUR
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
