Petitioner withdrew a writ application because it had become infructuous. The court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the application.
Permission granted for withdrawal of the writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8328 of 2023
======================================================
Pramod Kumar Son of Mahendra Ram, Resident of Village and P.O. Shrikhinda, P.S. Nokha, District Rohtas, Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Vaishnavi Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md. Nadim Seraj (GP-5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
3 15-12-2023 Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application, as the writ application has become infructuous.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
vinita/-
U
Pramod Kumar
State of Bihar
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
