Disposed

Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Apr 2023CWJC/812/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner alleges the selected Anganwari worker has duplicate qualifications and the complaint remains pending for three years. Court directs Respondent No. 5 to examine the complaint, hear both parties, and pass a reasoned order within four months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 5 to examine Complaint Case No. 89/2020, hear both sides, and pass a reasoned order within four months from receipt of this order.

Babita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.812 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Babita Kumari W/o Sanjay Kumar R/o Village- Siveriaina, P.O.-Gidha, P.S.Saraiya, District-Muzaffarpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Family and Social Welfare, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director Integrated Child Development Services, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

¶10

The District Programme Officer, (I.C.D.S.), Muzafarpur.

¶11

The Child Development Project Officer, Saraiya District-Muzaffarpur.

¶12

The Lady Supervisor-Cum Member Secretary Selection Committee I.C.D.S. Office, Saraiya, District-Muzaffarpur

¶13

Gulshan Khatoon D/o Md. Jafar W/o Md. Afroz, Resident of VillageSiveriaima,P.S.-Saraiya, District-Muzaffarpur.

¶14

... ... Respondents

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha (GA7) ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 17-04-2023 Petitioner, in the present case, is seeking a direction to

¶18

the District Programme Officer (ICDS), Muzaffarpur (Respondent No. 5).

¶19

According to the petitioner, she has lodged a complaint bearing Complaint Case No. 89/2020 (Annexure ‘4’), in which she has made complaint that the selected candidate for the post of Anganbari Sewika Centre No. 333, Ward No. 05, situated in village – Panchayat – Bahilwala, Govind, within Saraiya Anchal of District – Muzaffarpur, is having two matriculation certificates. Her date of birth mentioned as per the

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.812 of 2023(2) dt.17-04-2023 2/2

¶21

certificate of Madarsa is 10.03.1998 whereas her matriculation examination certificate shows her date of birth as 04.08.1996.

¶22

Learned counsel submits that for more than three years the complaint is pending and the respondent no. 5 is not hearing the parties.

¶23

Learned counsel for the State submits that in such circumstance, appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no. 5 to dispose of the complaint of the petitioner after hearing both the sides.

¶24

Having regard to the submissions noted hereinabove, this Court directs respondent no. 5 to examine complaint case no. 89/2020 and after hearing both the sides pass an appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶25

This Writ Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶26

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.)

¶27

lata/-

¶28

Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumar Chanchal Vs The State of Bihar

Jaya Kumari Vs The Central Bank of India

Sushila Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Roushan Kumar Jha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Munni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kumar Gautam Vs The State of Bihar