Disposed

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Jun 2023CWJC/7440/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners admitted under a Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination scheme complained that examinations were not being conducted. The court granted liberty to file a detailed representation with respondent nos. 1 and 2, who were to decide within two months. The writ application was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a detailed representation before respondents 1 and 2, who must take an appropriate decision within two months.

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7440 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Manish Kumar Son of Baleshwar Prasad Yadav, resident of R.D.H. High Schol, Rajgir, Police Station-Rajgir, in the district of Nalanda, Bihar.

¶4

Satyendra Kumar, Son of Chandeshwar Prasad, Resident of Bhaluwaha, Police Station and District Sitamarhi.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Dy. Director Academy, Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination, Chanakya National Law University Campus, Mithapur, Patna.

¶9

The Senior Executive Officer, Student Help services Department, Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination, Chanakya National Law University Campus, Mithapur, Patna.

¶10

The Dy. Director-cum-Administration and Account Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination, Chanakya National Law University Campus, Mithapur, Patna.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Madhaw Pd. Yadaw, GP-23 ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 27-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶15

State.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination is running a schooling and training scheme of Amanat degree for betterment of Amins under the guidance of the Department of Education, Government of Bihar. It is stated that the petitioners have taken admission in the said institution and they are waiting for their examination but the institution is not conducting examination.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.7440 of 2023(2) dt.27-06-2023 2/2

¶18

In the nature of the grievance of the petitioners, this Court grants liberty to the petitioners to file a detail representation before the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar (respondent no.1) and the Deputy Director, Academy, Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination, Chanakaya National Law University Campus, Mithapur (respondent no.2) as early as possible whereupon the respondent nos.1 and 2 shall consider the same and take an appropriate decision within a period of two months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order.

¶19

This writ application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶20

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶21

arvind/-

¶22

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Paswan @ Dharmendra Kumar @ Rudal Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Tulan Kumar @ Uttam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

MD Bablu Vs The State of Bihar

Rashmi Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Kalpana Priya Vs The Chairman Bihar School Examination Board

Motilal Yadav @ Moti Ray Vs The State of Bihar