Petitioner sought permission to withdraw his criminal miscellaneous application; the court granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21000 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2022 Thana- KASHICHAK District- Nawada
======================================================
TULAN KUMAR @ UTTAM KUMAR S/o Mithelesh Singh Resident of Daula Chak, P.S. Kashichak, District-Nawada
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Bihari Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Saroj Kumar Choudhry, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, learned APP for the
State and Mr. Saroj Kumar Choudhry, learned Advocate for the Informant are present.
Permission is granted.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
tusharika/-
U T
Tulan Kumar @ Uttam Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
