Disposed

Vidyavati Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Dec 2023CWJC/7358/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a widow of a retired employee, challenged non-payment of enhanced gratuity. Court noted standard gratuity was paid but enhanced amount remained undecided by the Board. Petition disposed of with right to approach court if enhancement is adopted later.

What did the court decide?

No immediate relief; declared right to approach court if enhanced gratuity is sanctioned by BSFC in future.

Vidyavati Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7358 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Vidyavati Devi, W/o Late Shashibhushan Tiwari, Resident of Village- Pipra, District- East Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Department.

¶7

The Chief Finance, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. Sone Bhawan, 5th Floor, Birchande Patel Path.

¶8

¶9

The Collector, East Champaran, Motihari

¶10

The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. Motihari, East Champaran.

¶11

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to AG For the BSFC : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 05-12-2023

¶17

Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel representing the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Learned counsel for the State is also present.

¶18

The petitioner is a hapless widow of late Shashibhushan Tiwari, who superannuated from the post of Night Guard on 31.01.2016 from the office of Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Motihari (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BSFC’), has filed the present writ petition

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.7358 of 2020 dt.05-12-2023 2/3

¶20

seeking a direction upon the respondent authorities to ensure payment of all the admissible gratuity and leave encashment.

¶21

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the BSFC. Mr. Singh by referring to the statements made therein submitted that having considered the grievance of the petitioner, the amount of gratuity as well as earned leave have already been sanctioned and paid to the petitioner vide Memo No. 7799 dated 29.09.2020. It has further clarified that the ceiling of gratuity amount, as has been adopted by the Board of Directors, BFSC, is fixed to Rs.3,50,000/- and the same has been paid to all the retired employees till date. So far the claim for enhanced amount of gratuity to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/- is concerned, the same has not been adopted by the BSFC till date.

¶22

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner by referring to a judgment of this Court in the case of Surendra Prasad Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. (CWJC No. 15074 of 2012) submits that in similarly circumstanced one of the employee has been allowed the benefit of enhanced gratuity amount to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/-. However, he is not disputed the fact that the aforesaid order of the learned Single Judge has been set aside by the learned Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 397 of 2018 to the extent of granting

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.7358 of 2020 dt.05-12-2023 3/3

¶24

enhanced gratuity of Rs.10,00,000/-.

¶25

He thus fairly submits that nonetheless, the

¶26

Board of Directors has not taken a decision with regard to payment of enhanced gratuity to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/- as yet, but in case, Board of Director or the BSFC takes such a decision, the petitioner may be allowed to raise her claim for enhanced gratuity.

¶27

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking note of the fact that admissible gratuity as well as earned leave amounts have been paid to the petitioner, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶28

However, it goes without saying that in case the BSFC takes a decision with regard to payment of enhanced gratuity, the eligible employee or the dependents have every right to approach the authority or the Court to raise his/her grievance.

¶29

This disposes the writ petition.

¶30

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶31

uday/-

¶32

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	06.04.2023
Transmission Date	NA

Vidyavati Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vidyavati Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mahesh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Pashupati Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Nandan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar