charges of any making excess payment to the Contractor, all the more sufficient EMD of the Contractor is lying with the respondent officials. Referring to the Government Circular, contained in Memo No. 4564 dated 06.07.1993, he submits across the Board that from the plain reading of the letter, it appears that the earned leave can be withheld only in a situation where the petitioner is facing any departmental or judicial proceeding on the date on which he superannuates and there is even a bleak chance of recovery of loss caused to the State exchequer on conclusion of enquiry, if recovery is ordered. He further submits that in the case in hand, there is no material suggesting any chance of recovery at the ends of the petitioner. He next submits that so far the benefit under the Assured Career Progression Scheme is concerned, admittedly, the same has been denied on the pretext of departmental proceeding, which has already come to an end on the exoneration of the petitioner way back in the year 2021 itself vide order dated 30.09.2021. He thus submits that in view of the matter, the petitioner is also entitled to the benefit of 2nd ACP as well as the 3rd MACP.