This is a discretionary order in a writ petition challenging an administrative order. The court notes that the petitioner's grievance was redressed during pendency. Consequently, the writ application was disposed of without passing any specific order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7318 of 2023
======================================================
Baijnath Prasad Son of Late Jhamela Mahto Resident of Mohalla- Jaipur Dhanuki, Police Station- Agamkuan, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Krishna Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag12)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
State counsel.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay/-
U
Baijnath Prasad
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary of Land Reform Department, Patna
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
