The High Court rejected the petitioner's bail prayer due to the nature of the accusation and trial progress. However, it directed the trial court to conclude the trial within one year, noting the petitioner had been in custody since August 2021.
Bail rejected; Trial to be concluded within one year from the date of receipt of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33800 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2021 Thana- BIHRA District- Saharsa
======================================================
VISHWANATH SAH Son of Late Lattar Sah R/V- Bihra, Premnagar PSBihra Dist- Saharsa
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Diwakar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
5 06-10-2023
rejected, vide order dated 05.04.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5767 of 2022.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shishir/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail of the petitioner should be rejected considering the nature of accusation and progress of trial.
Whether directions should be issued to the trial court to conclude the trial within a one-year period.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishwanath Sah
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
