The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated attempts at contact, indicating no interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6272 of 2017
======================================================
Hari Narayan Yadav Son of Late Genai Yadav, Resident of Village- Belahi, Post Office- Belahi, Police Station- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7 Mr.Uday Shankar Pandey, AC to GA-7 For the Respondent No.2 & 3 : Mr.Sanat Kr. Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent No.4 : Mr.Ralindra Nath Kanth,Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear for the petitioner, hence, it appears that the petitioner has got no interest in prosecuting the present writ petition, thus, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
sonal/- U
Hari Narayan Yadav
The State of Bihar
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
