The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition declaring it infructuous after the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the grievance had already been redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5526 of 2020
======================================================
Bikash Kumar S/o Sri Sudama Choudhary Resident of Village Jitan Bigha, P.O. Telhara, P.S. Telhara, Dist- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Shankar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, as such, this application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this application is disposed of as
infructuous.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
devendra/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application has become infructuous due to redressal of the grievance.
Bikash Kumar S/o Sri Sudama Choudhary
The Bihar School Examination Board Patna through its Chairman
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
