Allowed

Nitesh Kumar Sah @ Nitesh Kumar Gupta @ Nitesh Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Feb 2023CR. MISC./74476/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna heard two bail applications arising from the same police case involving allegations of assault, extortion, and attempted murder. Granting anticipatory bail, the court ordered an enlargement of the petitioners upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, subject to furnishing bail bonds and complying with Cr.P.C. Section 438(2).

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, furnishing bonds of Rs.25,000 each with two sureties of like amount.

Nitesh Kumar Sah @ Nitesh Kumar Gupta @ Nitesh Gupta Vs… — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74476 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2022 Thana- HAYAGHAT District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NITESH KUMAR SAH @ NITESH KUMAR GUPTA @ NITESH GUPTA S/O Suresh Prasad Gupta @ Suresh Sah R/O Village- Hayaghat, P.SHayaghat, District- Darbhanga

¶5

Pawan Kumar Gupta S/O Late Kishunji Sah R/O Village- Hayaghat, P.SHayaghat, District- Darbhanga

¶6

Manish Kumar Gupta S/O Late Madan Sah R/O Village- Hayaghat, P.SHayaghat, District- Darbhanga

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

with

¶13

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 160 of 2023

¶14

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2022 Thana- HAYAGHAT District- Darbhanga

¶15

======================================================

¶16

MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA S/o Suresh Prasad Gupta @ Suresh Sah R/o village- Hayaghat, P.S.- Hayaghat, Distt- Darbhanga.

¶17

... ... Petitioner/s

¶18

Versus

¶19

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶20

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶21

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 74476 of 2022) For the Petitioners : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. H.A. Khan, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 160 of 2023) For the Petitioner : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶22

2 04-02-2023 As both these bail applications have cropped up from

¶23

the same police station case number, hence, with consent of parties, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74476 of 2022(2) dt.04-02-2023 2/3

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

¶26

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Hayaghat P.S. Case No.130 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 385, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶27

As per FIR, it is alleged that the informant was constructing his house, in the meantime, the petitioners alongwith other co-accused persons stopped the construction work and demanded ransom of Rs.5,00,000/- and on refusal, the accused persons started brick-bating and further assaulted the informant and his brother with iron rod and also snatched golden chain.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioner no.1 of Cr. Misc. No.74476 of 2022 and petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.160 of 2023 have got one criminal antecedent and rest petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petitions. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides sustained injuries.

¶29

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74476 of 2022(2) dt.04-02-2023 3/3

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioners enclosed the injury report of the injured in Cr. Misc. No.160 of 2023, from perusal of which, it appears that the injuries are simple in nature.

¶31

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶32

Considering the facts that there is admitted land dispute between the parties and injuries sustained by the injured person are simple in nature, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Darbhanga in connection with Hayaghat P.S. Case No.130 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶33

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶34

S.KUMAR/-

¶35

U T

Nitesh Kumar Sah @ Nitesh Kumar Gupta @ Nitesh Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitesh Kumar Sah @ Nitesh Kumar Gupta @ Nitesh Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinay Kumar Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar @ Nishant Kumar @ Ashokh Kumar @ Nishant Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Kumar Mandal @ Subhash Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Prasad Chaurasiya Vs The State of Bihar

Chintu Chaudhary @ Chintu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar