Ajit Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The high court entertained a writ petition but allowed the petitioners to withdraw the matter. Subsequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
The high court entertained a writ petition but allowed the petitioners to withdraw the matter. Subsequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4911 of 2017
======================================================
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Ranjan Sinha Ms. Seema Kumari, Advocates For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, AC to GA-10 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
counsel for the State.
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-
U
Ajit Kumar Son of Late Mishri Lal
Vishnu Kant Pandey Son of Late Parmanand Pandey
The State Of Bihar through the Principle Secretary
The Director-in-Chief, Health Department
The Divisional Director, Health Services, Patna Division
The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Sadar Hospital, Nalanda
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court