This court dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous because a period of three years had elapsed since its filing.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4887 of 2019
======================================================
Awadhesh Narain Singh, son of late Keshav Prasad Singh, Panchwati Shri Krishnapuri, P.S.-Shri Krishnapuri, District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma, Advoccate For the V.S.K University: Ms. Nutan Sahay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
period of three years have elapsed by now and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by effluex of time.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having
become infructuous.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Ashwini/-
Item No.8
U
Awadhesh Narain Singh
Veer Kuwar Singh University, Ara through Registrar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
