Learner counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition became infructuous, leading the single judge court to dismiss the petition on that ground without substantive discussion.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3350 of 2019
======================================================
Harit Kumar Krishna, Son of Manrup Prasad Yadav, resident of Ward No. 8, Inarwa, Ghallar, Madhepura, District- Madhepura, Bihar- 852124
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Madanjeet Kumar (GP20) Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Advocate Mr. Mrigendra Kumar Sharma, AC to GP-20
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
As such, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Ashwini/Item No.78
U
Harit Kumar Krishna
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
The Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Lalunagar, Madhepura through its Vice Chancellor
The Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Lalunagar, Madhepura
The Secretary, Raghunandan Prasad Mandal Degree College, Tuniyahi, Madhepura
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
