Allowed

M/s Shambhu Traders v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 May 2023CWJC/4753/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the Patna High Court held that a cancellation of GST registration order was nonspeaking and violated natural justice as it lacked stated reasons. The court quashed the order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and noted available statutory remedies for revocation.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order of cancellation of registration at Annexure-2 was set aside, and the issue was directed to be reconsidered.

M/s Shambhu Traders Vs The State of Bihar — GST and Indirect Tax | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4753 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

M/s Shambhu Traders, Registered Office Situated at Lohia Chowk, Maheshkhunt, District-Khagaria, State-Bihar, PIN Code-801503, through its Proprietor, Santosh Kumar Son of Shambhu Keshri, aged about 27 Years, Gender-Male, Resident of Ward no.11, Lohia Chouk, Mahesh Khunt, DistrictKhagaria, State-Patna, PIN Code-851213.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through its Secretary Finance, Government of Bihar.

¶7

Additional Commissioner of State Tax, Purnea.

¶8

Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Khagaria.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vivek Prasad (GP-7)

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶14

Date : 02-05-2023

¶15

The petitioner is aggrieved with the cancellation of registration by Annexure-2 order dated 09.05.2022. An appeal was filed which was delayed, which also stood rejected. Insofar as the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act is concerned, now there is no Tribunal constituted for the State.

¶16

In such circumstances, we have looked at the order at Annexure-2, especially since the learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that it is a non-speaking order. We see

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.4753 of 2023 dt.02-05-2023 2/4

¶18

from the order that there is no reason stated as to why the cancellation was ordered and not even the subject of the notice is referred to in the order.

¶19

It is the submission of the learned counsel for the State that the form GST REG-19 has been adopted by the Assessing Officer.

¶20

We extract form GST REG-19:-

¶21

As we see from the Bihar Goods and Services

¶22

Taxes Rules, 2017, GST REG-19 has a specific column where reasons have to be assigned. However, the Assessing Officer seems to be laboring under the belief

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.4753 of 2023 dt.02-05-2023 3/4

¶24

that when an assessee does not appear or an objection is not filed, no reasons have to be assigned.

¶25

We cannot countenance the said order, especially when there is absolutely no reason stated regarding the cancellation of registration.

¶26

We also notice the judgment of another Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court passed in Manoj Kumar Sah versus The State of Bihar and Anr. in C.W.J.C. No. 18307 of 2022 wherein it has been stated so:-

¶27

" It cannot be disputed that with the passing of the said order, petitioner is liable to both civil and penal consequences. To say the least, the authority ought to have at least referred to the contents of the show cause and the response thereto, which was not done. Not only the order is nonspeaking, but cryptic in nature and the reason of cancellation not decipherable therefrom. Principles of natural justice stand violated and the order needs to be quashed as it entails penal and pecuniary consequences. "

¶28

The impugned order in the instant writ petition also

¶29

suffers from the very same illegality which has been pointed out by the Division Bench. In such circumstances, we set aside the order at Annexure-2 and direct reconsideration of the issue.

¶30

In this context, we also notice that notification No. 3 of 2023 has been brought in by the Central Government on the

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.4753 of 2023 dt.02-05-2023 4/4

¶32

recommendations of the G.S.T. Council wherein if the cancellation has been effected for failure to file returns under clause (b) or clause (c) of Sub-section (2) of Section 29, there is a further period allowed up to 30.06.2023, wherein the registered person can apply for revocation of cancellation. This is also subject to the condition that the return should be filed up to the effective date of cancellation of registration and the payment of tax, interest, penalty and late fee in respect of such returns have also been made. The assessee would also be entitled to avail of the said remedy if the cancellation has been effected under clause (b) or clause (c) of Sub-section (2) of Section 29.

¶33

The writ petition stands allowed.

¶34

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

¶35

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶36

P.K.P./Anushka

¶37

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date	03.05.2023
Transmission Date

M/s Shambhu Traders v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Shambhu Traders v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Patel Engineering Limited Vs The State of Bihar

Bhavani Automobiles Vs The State of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sheo Shankar Trading Company Vs Bihar State Goods and Services Tax

M/s Rangoli Hardware Mach Marts Jamui Vs The Union of India