Allowed

Patel Engineering Limited v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 May 2023CWJC/1603/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition addressed the inability to avail statutory appeal remedies due to the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal. The court granted a stay on tax recovery upon partial deposit, directing the petitioner to file the formal appeal once the Tribunal is constituted.

What did the court decide?

Stay of recovery of balance tax amount subject to deposit of 20% of the remaining tax disputed; extension of statutory stay benefit until Tribunal constitution.

Patel Engineering Limited Vs The State of Bihar — GST and Indirect Tax | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1603 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Patel Engineering Limited a registered company having its local place of business at 3C, Prabha Enclave, East Boring Canal Road, Behind Gorakh Nath Compund, Patna- 800001 presently at C/o Naveen Ranjan, Behind Kerosene Oil Depot., Ward No. 21, Station Road, Gopalganj, Bihar through its authorized representative namely Vijay Kamble alias Vijay Lalasing Kamble male aged about 47 years son of Lalsing Kamble resident of 601, Shanti Smruti, CHS Ltd. Raje Shivaji Nagar, Saki Vihar Road, Opposite L and T Gate No. 7, Tunga Village, Powai, Andheri East, Mumbai (Sub Urban)400072, Maharashtra.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Commissioner, Department of State Taxes, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

¶8

¶9

The Additional of State Taxes (Appeals), Central Division, Patna.

¶10

The Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes, Special Circle, Patna.

¶11

The Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes, Special Circle, Patna. (September 2018- March 2019)

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶18

Date : 01-05-2023

¶19

The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs.

¶20

The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal" ) under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act").

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.1603 of 2023 dt.01-05-2023 2/4

¶22

However, due to non-constitution of the Tribunal , the petitioner is deprived of his statutory remedy under Sub-Section (8) and Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act.

¶23

Under the circumstances, the petitioner is also prevented from availing the benefit of stay of recovery of balance amount of tax in terms of Section 112 (8) and (9) of the B.G.S.T Act upon deposit of the amounts as contemplated under Sub-section (8) of Section 112.

¶24

The respondent State authorities have acknowledged the fact of non-constitution of the Tribunal and come out with a notification bearing Order No. 09/2019-State Tax, S. O. 399, dated 11.12.2019 for removal of difficulties, in exercise of powers under Section 172 of the B.G.S.T Act, which provides that period of limitation for the purpose of preferring an appeal before the Tribunal under Section 112 shall start only after the date on which the President, or the State President, as the case may be, of the Tribunal after its constitution under Section 109 of the B.G.S.T Act, enters office.

¶25

This Court is, therefore, inclined to dispose of the instant writ petition in the following terms:-

¶26

(i) Subject to deposit of a sum equal to 20 percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, if not already deposited, in addition to the amount deposited earlier under Sub-Section

¶27

Patna High Court CWJC No.1603 of 2023 dt.01-05-2023

¶28

3/4

¶29

(6) of Section 107 of the B.G.S.T. Act, the petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit of stay under Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act. The petitioner cannot be deprived of the benefit, due to non- constitution of the Tribunal by the respondents themselves. The recovery of balance amount, and any steps that may have been taken in this regard will thus be deemed to be stayed. It is not in dispute that similar relief has been granted by this Court in the case of SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Others in C.W.J.C. No. 15465 of 2022 .

¶30

(ii) The statutory relief of stay, on deposit of the statutory amount, however in the opinion of this Court, cannot be open ended. For balancing the equities, therefore, the Court is of the opinion that since order is being passed due to nonconstitution of the Tribunal by the respondentAuthorities, the petitioner would be required to present/file his appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act, once the Tribunal is constituted and made functional and the President or the State President may enter office. The appeal would be required to be filed observing the statutory requirements after coming into existence of the Tribunal, for facilitating consideration of the appeal.

¶31

(iii) In case the petitioner chooses not to avail the remedy of appeal by filing any appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act before the Tribunal within the period which may be specified upon constitution of the Tribunal, the respondent- Authorities would be at liberty to proceed further in the matter, in accordance with law.

¶32

With the above liberty, observation and directions, the

¶33

Patna High Court CWJC No.1603 of 2023 dt.01-05-2023 4/4

¶34

writ petition stands disposed of.

¶35

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

¶36

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶37

rajkishore/- AFR/NAFR N/A CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 02.05.2023. Transmission Date N/A

Patel Engineering Limited v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Patel Engineering Limited v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar Sinha Vs M/s Rohtas Industries Ltd. (in liquidation)

Vijay Prabhat Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Regimental Printing Press, the Bihar Regimental Centre Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bhavani Automobiles Vs The State of Bihar

Bhavani Automobiles Vs The State of Bihar