This order determined that the High Court cannot decide disputed questions of title regarding the land. The application was disposed of with liberty for parties to seek a refund of deposits due.
Application disposed of. Liberty granted to petitioners to approach District Board for refund of deposited amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4397 of 2021
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
ORAL ORDER
Pursuant to the order dated 30.11.2023, the Deputy
5 07-12-2023
Patna High Court CWJC No.4397 of 2021(5) dt.07-12-2023 2/3
Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, District Board, Gaya is present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4397 of 2021(5) dt.07-12-2023 3/3
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Saif/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ jurisdiction can decide the disputed question of right, title and interest regarding land between petitioners and District Board.
Ranjeet Kumar
Abhishek Kumar
The State of Bihar
The District Board, Gaya
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
