Oral order dismissing the writ application under Art. 226 for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite court intimation.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4213 of 2019
======================================================
Binay Kumar@Vinay Kumar Son of Sadhu Saran Singh Resident of VillageSirnawan, P.S.- Bena, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Archana Meenakshee (Gp6)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
HarshPandey/-
U
Binay Kumar@Vinay Kumar
The State Of Bihar and Ors
SATYAVRAT VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
