Disposed

Gopal Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Dec 2023CWJC/3467/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the petitioner to file a representation under Rule 4(C) of the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011 and imposed a time-limit for the respondent authority to decide the claim for promotion benefits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file representation under Rule 4(C) of the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011; respondent authority to decide within 90 days.

Gopal Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3467 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Gopal Singh, son of Late Ram Prakash Singh, resident of villageKhojagachhi, P.S.- Barbigha, District- Sheikhprua.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The Additional Chief Secretary, General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Inspector General of Police (Central Range), Patna.

¶10

The Inspector General of Police (Headquarters), Bihar, Patna.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Nath Pathak, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. N.H. Khan (SC-1) ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 22-12-2023

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶16

counsel for the State.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed directing the respondent to provide the benefits to the petitioner against post of Inspector of Police and grant all consequential benefits w.e.f. 14.02.2017. Counsel also submits that during pendency of the writ petition, the promotion and consequential benefits of the petitioner has been taken into consideration, but it was granted w.e.f. April, 2020 so, the only grievance left to the petitioner is that he is entitled for promotion w.e.f. 14.02.2017. Counsel further

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.3467 of 2020(2) dt.22-12-2023 2/2

¶19

submits that the case of the petitioner is well covered by order dated 20.02.2018 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 239 of 2015 has squarely covered by the case of Ramjee Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. reported in 2016 (1) PLJR 226.

¶20

It transpires to this Court that major grievance of the petitioner has been settled and only the dispute relating to the date of granting benefit has to be taken into consideration which according to the petitioner has covered by the decision of this Court mentioned above.

¶21

This Court is hereby directs that the petitioner shall file his representation under 4(C) of the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011 within four weeks along with this order and the authority Inspector General of Police, (Headquarters), Bihar, Patna (respondent No. 5) is directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representation filed by the petitioner within 90 days.

¶22

With the directions and observations made above, this writ petition is hereby disposed of.

¶23

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶24

Divyansh/-

¶25

Gopal Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaishankar Pd. Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jyotindra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitu Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Braj Kishore Vs The State of Bihar

Gauri Shankar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Sukla Vs The State of Bihar