A civil writ petition by a petitioner against State of Bihar and Home Guard authorities was heard and dismissed as infructuous with passage of time; liberty given to seek dues via representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3031 of 2020
======================================================
Jyotindra Kumar S/o Jitendra Kumar Vishwakarma R/o 726/527, J.K. Sadan, Rajendra Path, Benibaghicha, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna- 800001.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Narayan Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md.N.H.Khan (SC-1)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
counsel for the State.
become infructuous. As such, it is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to prefer representation before the appropriate authority for his any dues.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Divyansh/-
U
Jyotindra Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police
The Director General-cum-Commandant General Home Guard
The Home Secretary, Home Special Department, Govt. of Bihar
The District Magistrate (Collector) Patna
The Deputy Inspector General-cum-Deputy Commandant General Home Guard
Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
