Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the civil writ application to file a criminal writ application instead. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application.
Permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file a criminal writ application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3249 of 2023
======================================================
Sudhir Kumar, Son of Late Radha Prasad, Resident of South Gandhi Nagar, P.S.- Sadar, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.
... ... Petitioner
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3 For the UOI : Mr. Assistant Solicitor General For the Vigilance : Mr. Tuhin Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw this application with permission to file criminal writ application in the light of the stamp report defect no. 70 pointing out that it may be filed under Cr.W.J.C.
Permission is granted.
The application is dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty as prayed for.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3249 of 2023(2) dt.05-05-2023 2/2
Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, learned AC to AAG-3 for the State, Mr. Assistant Solicitor General, learned counsel for the Union of India and Mr. Tuhin Shankar, learned Advocate for the Vigilance are present.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
lekhi/-
U
Sudhir Kumar
The Union of India
The State of Bihar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
