Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ application. The High Court granted permission, dismissing the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ application is accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.287 of 2019
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhav Jha- Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan- AC to GP-6 For Election Commission: Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh- Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey- Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 12-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
Patna High Court CWJC No.287 of 2019(3) dt.12-05-2023 2/2
counsel for the State.
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks
permission to withdraw the present writ application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, instant writ application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U
Paras Nath Ray
Ram Shakal Yadav
The State of Bihar
The State Election Commission
Anita Devi
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
