Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition as infructuous; Court disposed of petition accordingly.
Withdrawal of petition allowed; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2836 of 2020
======================================================
Asha Constructions Private Limited through its Director Mr. Anish Kumar, S/o Pashupati Kumar, Male, Aged about 50 years, Resident of MIG-51, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna-800020.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate Mr. Swetank, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manish Kumar (GP-4) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 26-07-2023
Mr. Swetank, learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instruction from Mr. Siddharth Prasad wants withdrawal of the petition as the same has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
kiran/-
U
Asha Constructions Private Limited through its Director Mr. Anish Kumar
The State of Bihar through the DGP, Bihar
The Patna Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna
The Station House Officer, Kotwali Police Station, Patna
The Sub-Inspector Mobile, Kotwali Police Station, Patna
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
