Petitioner sought a direction to transfer her son, a Constable in the C.R.P.F., from Greater Noida to Patna due to her critical illness. The Court found no reason for compulsion but observed that the matter can be perused under existing transfer policies.
Writ application disposed of; observation made to consider representation under respondent policies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2787 of 2023
======================================================
Shakuntala Devi, W/o Damodar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Mirachak, Maner, P.S. - Maner, Post - Maner, District - Patna, Pin - 801108, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sagar Suman, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey, CGC.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 28-04-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.
2. The petitioner in the present case is seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the transfer of her son who is posted as Constable at Greater Noida in the State of U.P. to his Home District in Patna, State of Bihar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is 67 years old and her husband is 79 years old and they are critically ill, therefore, the transfer of the son of the petitioner be considered on sympathetic grounds.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2787 of 2023 dt.28-04-2023 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the son of the petitioner is posted at Noida in the State of U.P. where good medical facilities are available, therefore, he can take care of his parents while living at Noida. It is further submitted that the son of the petitioner has been transferred to Noida on 08.09.2022.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents, this Court finds no reason to issue any direction to the respondents to transfer the son of the petitioner in the home district, however, this Court would observe that in case the respondents have any policy whereunder they can consider the case of transfer of the son of this petitioner, the dismissal of this writ application shall not come in their way and the representation may be considered in accordance with the policies of the respondents.
6. This writ application stands disposed of accordingly.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
SUSHMA2/-
| AFR/NAFR | |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | |
| Uploading Date | 28.04.2023 |
| Transmission Date |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to transfer her son to his home district based on sympathetic grounds due to her critical illness.
Shakuntala Devi
Union of India through Director General of Police, C.R.P.F.
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
