The Civil Writ jurisdiction petition challenging restrictions on a shop remains disposed off as not pressed after the lock was unlocked. The court did not address the substantive prayer on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2757 of 2023
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.P.K. Verma (Aag3) Mr.Sanjay Kr. Sharma, AC to AAG-3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
following relief:-
“i) For direction to the respondents to open the shop which was situated at Khata No. 116, Khesra No. 713, d][k] jdok 4.9375 Dismil situated at Nath
Patna High Court CWJC No.2757 of 2023(3) dt.18-07-2023 2/2
Nagar, Bazar Lane.
(ii) For direction to the respondents to take appropriate action against the responsible authority according with law.”
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the grievances of the petitioners has now stood redressed, inasmuch as the locks put on the shop of the petitioners have already been unlocked, hence the petitioners do not wish to press the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Saurav/-
U
Nilofar Shams Tabraj Ansari
Mohammad Shams Tabrez Ansari
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
