Writ petition sought implementation of an SDM order directing a private respondent to vacate the petitioner's house. Respondents reported compliance, with possession restored to the petitioner. The petition was disposed of as not pressed since no subsisting grievance remained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2334 of 2017
======================================================
Parmila Devi wife of Sunil Bharti, Resident of- Aawas Board Ward No.- 4, P.S.- Muffasil Khagaria District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dronacharya, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr.Kinkar Kumar-SC9 Mr.Yogesh Kumar, AC to SC-9 Mr.Ashutosh Kr. Upadhyay, AC to SC-9 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
2 18-04-2023 Though the present writ petition has been filed for implementing the order dated 16.07.2014, passed by SubDivisional Magistrate-cum-House Controller, Khagaria in case no.02 of 2010, whereby and whereunder the respondent no.6 has been directed to vacate the house in question, however, the respondents have filed a supplementary counter affidavit, which is taken on record, wherein it has been stated that now the aforesaid order dated 16.07.2014 has stood complied with, and after giving opportunity of hearing to the private respondent no.6, necessary steps have been taken, whereupon the Sub-
Patna High Court CWJC No.2334 of 2017(2) dt.18-04-2023 2/2
Divisional Magistrate-cum-House Controller, Khagaria had passed the final order dated 15.04.2023, and then a Magistrate was deputed to get the house in question vacated, pursuant whereupon the house of the petitioner has been vacated by the respondent no.6 on 16.04.2023.
The learned senior counsel, appearing for the petitioner, has not disputed the fact that the petitioner has now got back possession of the house in question on 17.04.2023, hence, it is submitted that the petitioner is not having any subsisting grievance at the moment, thus, the present writ petition may be disposed off.
According, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
kanchan/Saurav
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking implementation of the SDM's order dated 16.07.2014 directing respondent no.6 to vacate the petitioner's house should be granted relief.
Parmila Devi
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Khagaria
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate-cum-House Controller, Khagaria
The Circle Officer, Khagaria
The Executive Magistrate, Khagaria
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
