Petitioner's grievance was redressed during the pendency of the writ petition; counsel submitted the petition was not being pressed, and the court disposed of it as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22983 of 2013
======================================================
Ram Chandra Prasad Son Of Late Kuldip Prasad Resident Of Village Khaneta, P.O. and P.S. Belaganj District Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Hriday Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raju Giri GP 30 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
2 22-06-2023 The learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that the grievance of the petitioner has stood redressed during the interregnum period, hence, the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
rinkee/-
U
Ram Chandra Prasad
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
Principal Secretary-Cum-Commissioner, Finance Department, Bihar, Patna
District Magistrate, Gaya
Deputy Development Commissioner, Gaya
Block Development Officer, Guraru, Gaya
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
