Disposed

Ram Manohar Pathak v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jun 2023CWJC/1960/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ application seeking reliefs related to teacher employment was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, which the court permitted upon the State's consent.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the writ application permitted with liberty to appeal before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority within 30 days.

Ram Manohar Pathak Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1960 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ram Manohar Pathak Son of Shri Radheyshyam Pathak, Resident of VillageBarawan, Post Office- Asaon, Police Station - Andar, District- Siwan. At present posted and working as a Prakhand Teacher, Govt. Middle Schoolcum-Upgraded High School Barawan, Block- Andar, District- Siwan.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Additional Chief Secretary-cum-the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

¶10

The District Education Officer, Siwan.

¶11

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan.

¶12

The Chairman-cum-Prkahand Pramukh, Block Teachers Employment Committee, Andar, District- Siwan.

¶13

The Block Development Officer-cum-Secretary, Block Teachers Employment Committee, Andar, District- Siwan.

¶14

The Block Education Officer, Block- Andar, District- Siwan.

¶15

Smt. Priyanka Singh, Wife of Sri Govind Singh, Prakhand Teacher, Govt. Middle School-cum-Upgraded High School Barawan, Anchal- Andar, District- Siwan.

¶16

... ... Respondents

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance :

¶19

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP-23 ======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶21

2 22-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶22

counsel for the State.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may

¶24

be allowed to withdraw this writ application with liberty to file an appropriate appeal before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Siwan within a period of 30 days from

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.1960 of 2023(2) dt.22-06-2023 2/2

¶26

today.

¶27

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the

¶28

same.

¶29

In the given circumstance, this writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to seek his remedy, if any, available to him before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Siwan by filing an appeal within a period of 30 days from today. If any such appeal is preferred, the same will be considered on it’s own merit and the question of limitation, if any arising in the appeal, would be considered keeping in view the petitioner was pursuing his writ application in this Court under some bonafide belief.

¶30

This Writ Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶31

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶32

Rajeev/-

¶33

Ram Manohar Pathak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Manohar Pathak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Najir Alam @ Md. Najir Aal Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhunath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Guru Prasad Kashyap Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Asgar Vs The State of Bihar