This court dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of an arms license application. The court held that it will not examine the facts but only procedural lapses, finding none to interfere with the impugned orders of the District Magistrate and Commissioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1933 of 2022
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar Yadavendu Sono f Sidheshwar Prasad Residentof VillageMahamanna P.S.-Tekari, District-Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 12-12-2023
has been affirmed by the appellate authority i.e. the Commissioner.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1933 of 2022(4) dt.12-12-2023 2/2
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Sanjay Kumar Yadavendu Sono
State of Bihar
Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya
District Magistrate, Gaya
Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya
District Arms Magistrate, Gaya
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
