This oral order notes the reliefs sought by the petitioner regarding disputed land possession and an impugned order. However, the writ petition was dismissed because it was not pressed by the petitioner.
None; the petition was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19137 of 2017
======================================================
Aftab Alam Son of Late Shakil Ahmad, Resident of Village- Imadpatti, P.O.Bara Chakia, Police Station- Chakia, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manish Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raj Kishore Roy -Gp18
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
2 25-04-2023
The present writ petition has been filed seeking the
following reliefs:-
“1(i). For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions/quashing/setting aside the order dated 07.04.2015 of respondent no. 3 i.e. the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Chakia passed in Case No. 77 of 2014-15, whereby in absence of the petitioner, who is a directly affected party, the learned Respondent no. 4 has been pleased to hold that the land in question is a public land and directed the respondent no. 4 to act in accordance with law without appreciating and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as relevant materials on record.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19137 of 2017(2) dt.25-04-2023 2/2
(ii). For issuance of appropriate order/ orders, direction / directions commanding the respondents concerned not to disturb the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the said land as the petitioner is having valid title of the same and he is in possession of the same since very long.”
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondent authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Ajay/-
U
Aftab Alam Son of Late Shakil Ahmad
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Land Reforms, Government of Bihar
The Collector, East Champaran at Motihari
The Dy Collector Land Reforms, Chakia, District- East Champaran
The Circle Officer, Chakia, District- East Champaran
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
