Writ petition challenging government dues against petitioners disposed of as infructuous after petitioners submitted that all admissible dues had been accommodated during pendency.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18374 of 2022
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sameer Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Bandana Singh, AC to SC- 21 For the BSRTC : Mr. Anand Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
Patna High Court CWJC No.18374 of 2022(2) dt.05-12-2023 2/2
ORAL ORDER
2 05-12-2023
Heard Mr. Sameer Ranjan, learned counsel for the
petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.
(Harish Kumar, J)
uday/-
U
Dinesh Mishra and Others
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Bihar
The Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
