Dismissed

Raj Kumar Singh v. Kameshwar Singh and Ors.

Patna HC17 Feb 2023CWJC/18006/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil writ petition filed for quashing an order of the Sub-Judge, Vaishali rejecting an application under Order VII Rule 11 and dropping title suit proceedings, the Patna High Court found no grounds to interfere and dismissed the petition as not pressed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition has been dismissed as not pressed after the court found it was not persuaded to interfere with the impugned order.

Raj Kumar Singh Vs Kameshwar Singh and Ors. — Property and Title | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18006 of 2010

¶2

======================================================

¶3

RAJ KUMAR SINGH, S/o Ganga Singh, resident of village-Chandpura Nanahkar, P.S. Deshari, District-Vaishali

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Kameshwar Singh Son of Late Chandradeep Singh Resident of villageChandpura, Nanahkar, P. S. Desh Dist. Vaishali.

¶7

Rajni Devi W/o Late Madan Singh

¶8

Rana Ashwani Kumar Vicky S/o Late Madan Singh.

¶9

Respondent No. 2 and 3 are resident of village Chandpura, Nanahkar, P. S. Deshri, Dist. Vaishali.

¶10

Prabodh Singh S/o Late Indradeep Singh, Village- Chandpura Nanhkar, P.S. Deshari, Dist. Vaishdi.

¶11

Usha Devi w/o Late Navin Singh.

¶12

Satendra Singh S/o Late Navin Singh

¶13

Pinki Kumari D/o Late Navin Singh.

¶14

Respondent No. 5 to 7 are resident of village- Chandpura Nanhkar, P. S. Deshari, Dist. Vaishali.

¶15

Sakuntla Devi w/o Late Dev Narayan Singh 9. Sanjay Singh S/o Late Dev Narayan Singh.

¶16

Samresh Singh S/o Late Dev Narayan Singh Respondent No. 8, 9, 10 are resident of Village-Chandpura Nanhkar.

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr.Sushil Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr.Bam Bahadur Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶19

5 17-02-2023 The present writ petition has been filed

¶20

seeking the following relief:-

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.18006 of 2010(5) dt.17-02-2023 2/2

¶22

“1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 7.7.2010 passed by Sub-Judge IVth Vaishali at Hajipur in T.S. No. 444/2002, whereby and whereunder the learned court below has rejected the application filed by the defendant no. 1 filed U/O 7 Rule 11(D) read with order 23 Rule 23(A) and simultaneously the court below has

¶23

also dropped the proceeding of Title Suit.” After some arguments, finding that this

¶24

Court is not persuaded to interfere with the impugned order dated 07.07.2010, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to agitate his subsisting grievances before the learned Court below, in accordance with law.

¶25

Liberty so sought is granted.

¶26

The writ petition stands dismissed as not

¶27

pressed.

¶28

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶29

S.Sb/Saurav

¶30

Raj Kumar Singh v. Kameshwar Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar Singh v. Kameshwar Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basant Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Janak Mandal and Ors. Vs Priyabrat Mandal and Ors.

Shiv Shankar Prasad Jaiswal Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sarswati Devi @ Sarswati Kuer Vs Kameshwar Mishra and Ors.

Surendra Ram and Ors. Vs Ainul Haque @ Ainul and Ors.

Urmila Shrivastava and Anr. Vs Amarendra Dev Shrivastava