Petitioner sought GF.P. payment and pension revision. Court dismissed petition allowing remedy before competent authority if grievance subsists.
Petitioner has liberty to approach competent authority for redressal of grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17930 of 2022
======================================================
Surendra Prasad S/o Mangal Prasad, R/o- Village- Barkuiya, P.O. and P.S.Barauli, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 19-12-2023
Heard Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.17930 of 2022 dt.19-12-2023 2/2
(Harish Kumar, J)
rohit/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 20-12-2023 |
| Transmission Date |
Surendra Prasad
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Gopalganj
The Additional Collector, Gopalganj
The District Provident Fund Officer, Gopalganj
The Treasury Officer, Gopalganj
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
