Disposed

Sangita Kumari @ Mrs. Sangita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Feb 2023CWJC/1530/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Patna High Court directed the District Magistrate to provisionally release the petitioner's vehicle seized in an Excise case upon furnishing sureties and undertaking, subject to finalization of confiscation proceedings, allowing twelve days for release.

What did the court decide?

Issuance of Mandamus directing District Magistrate to provisionally release petitioner's vehicle within 14 days on furnishing sureties and undertaking, subject to finalization of proceedings; liberty

Sangita Kumari @ Mrs. Sangita Kumari Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1530 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sangita Kumari @ Mrs. Sangita Kumari Wife of Shambhu Kumar, Resident of near P.H.E.D. Office, Shiv Kumari Pahar, Purab Tola, Kahalgaon, P.S.Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Bhagalpur.

¶9

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur.

¶10

The State House Officer, Tatarpur, District- Bhagalpur.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Manish, SC-5

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶17

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶18

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶19

2 02-02-2023 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

¶20

“(i) For issuance of nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents as well as A.D.J.-XII-cum-Special Court of Excise-2, Bhagalpur to release the Maruti Dzire Car vehicle in favour of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR10AJ-1360, Engine No.K12NP4025077 Chasis No. MBHCZ, FB3SMG124787 on sureties on the personal bond only which has been seized by the police connection with Special Excise Case No.4321/2022 arise out of Tatarpur P.S. Case No.334/2022 dated in 14.11.2022 of

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.1530 of 2023(2) dt.02-02-2023 2/3

¶22

District- Bhagalpur (Bihar) for the offence registered under sections 30(a)/37 of Bihar Excise Prohibition Act as well as Amendment Act 2022; and learned District Magistrate, Bhagalpur has not started any confiscation proceeding.

¶23

(ii) For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled in the eye of law.”

¶24

Allegation is of recovery of 300 ml of illicit liquor from the seized vehicle of the petitioner.

¶25

Petitioner claims to be the owner of the said vehicle. It is further submitted that a meagre quantity of 300 ml of liquor has been recovered from the vehicle, as such, it cannot be inferred that the vehicle was used for transporting/carrying illicit liquor, nor it can be presumed that recovered illicit liquor was kept for sale/purchase/ trade purpose and it appears that same was kept for personal consumption.

¶26

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the District

¶27

Magistrate/Confiscating Officer concerned is directed to provisionally release the vehicle of petitioner after due identification of ownership of the vehicle on production of ownership and registration papers with respect to vehicle in question in his/her name and on furnishing adequate sureties to the satisfaction of District Magistrate / Confiscating Authority and undertaking.

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.1530 of 2023(2) dt.02-02-2023 3/3

¶29

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would however be subject to finalization of the confiscation proceeding.

¶30

Petitioner is also at liberty to get his/her vehicle released on payment of penalty in terms of Rule 12(A) inserted by amending Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021.

¶31

With said observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶32

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶33

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶34

shiv/Sujit

¶35

Sangita Kumari @ Mrs. Sangita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangita Kumari @ Mrs. Sangita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhardwaj and Sons Company Vs The State of Bihar

M/S Premi Printing Press, Industrial Estate Ramchandrapur, Nalanda Vs The State of Bihar

Rizwi Kalam Vs The Central Bank of India

M/s Crayons Advertising Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Srikant Sharma Vs The State of Bihar