Holding a writ petition for want of prosecution due to non-appearance by petitioners on multiple occasions, including the hearing date, the Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15129 of 2005
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Aag3 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
10 13-02-2023
From the order-sheet, it appears that earlier also not much keenness was shown by the petitioners and that is why on several occasions there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Today also, position is the same, hence, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition on account of want of prosecution.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
kanchan/-
U
The Chief Engineer, R.E.O., Rural Development Department, Patna and others
The State of Bihar through the Collector, Munger
Sadanand Singh
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
