Allowed

Yash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Feb 2023CR. MISC./3084/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail petition filed by Yaash Kumar and Paramjeet Mushar against the State of Bihar. The petitioners, accused of illegal liquor recovery under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2022, were directed to be released on furnishing bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Directing the petitioners to be enlarged on bail by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties to the Special Judge (Excise) Court.

Yash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3084 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2022 Thana- DURGAWATI District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

YASH KUMAR SON OF JUGGI SONKAR R/O VILLAGE- HAJIPUR, P.S.- BAHARIYAN BAY, DISTRICT- GAJIPUR (U.P.)

¶5

PARAMJEET MUSHAR SON OF SURESH MUSHAR R/O VILLAGEHAJIPUR, P.S.- BAHARIYAN BAY, DISTRICT- GAJIPUR (U.P.)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kiran Kumari Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 10-02-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 374 of 2022, registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

¶14

The allegation is regarding recovery of 144 liters of illicit liquor from a car and it is alleged that while the petitioners were fleeing away, they were caught by the police.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent, they have been falsely implicated in the present case, they are having clean

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3084 of 2023(2) dt.10-02-2023 2/2

¶17

antecedent and are languishing in custody since 14.12.2022.

¶18

Per contra , the learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the materials available on record as also considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner herein, I deem it fit and proper to direct for release of the petitioners on regular bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Special Judge (Excise) Court no.2, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No.374 of 2022.

¶21

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶22

rinkee/sonal-

¶23

U T

Yash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Gupta @ Ravi Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Safi @ Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Safi Vs the State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Mithilesh Kumar Singh @ Pintu Singh Vs The State of Bihar