Brick earth mining project operators had sought relief against State and environment authorities; with passage of time the petition became infructuous and was disposed of as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13954 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, AC to AAG-6 For the Mines : Mr. Naresh Dixit, Advocate For BSPCB : Mr. Shivendra Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr. Parijat Saurav, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.13954 of 2017(2) dt.27-07-2023 2/2
It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioners that with the passage of time, the petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
kiran/-
U
M/s Manzil Bricks through its Proprietor Md. Salman Ahmad and Ors
M/s B.B.C. Bricks through its Md. Abu Nasar Siddique
M/s Sara and Brothers its proprietor Sakra Khatoon
The State of Bihar
The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
