Disposed

Nawal Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC24 Nov 2023CWJC/12823/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction not to interfere with his ancestral land title. The court directed him to file an application before the Collector within six weeks, with the Collector to dispose of it by a reasoned order within six months. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file application before Respondent No. 2 within six weeks; Collector to dispose within six months by reasoned order.

Nawal Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12823 of 2015

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Nawal Singh S/o Late Sukhdeo Singh Resident of Village Bhatha, Police Station Maker, District Chapra ... Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar

¶6

The Collector, Saran.

¶7

The Deputy Collector Land Reform Saran, Chapra.

¶8

The Circle Officer, Chapra, District Saran.

¶9

Supan paswan S/o Late Sukeshwar Paswan.

¶10

Sanjay Paswan S/o Late Surendra Paswan

¶11

Balindra Paswan S/o Jageshwar Paswan

¶12

Harindra Paswan S/o Jageshwar Paswan

¶13

Shatrudhan Paswan S/o Baldeo Paswan

¶14

Kedar Paswan S/o Baldeo Paswan

¶15

Vijay Paswan S/o Late Yogendra Paswan All are Resident of Village Bhatha, Police Station Maker, District Saran.

¶16

... ... Respondents

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance :

¶19

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nirmal Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Thakur, AC to GA 13

¶20

======================================================

¶21

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶22

5 24-11-2023

¶23

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶24

Writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the right, title and interest of the petitioner over the land mentioned in paragraph 4 of the writ petition as his ancestors are in possession of the said land since 1909.

¶25

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be filing an application before the Collector, Saran at Chapra (respondent no.2) for redressail

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.12823 of 2015(5) dt.24-11-2023 2/2

¶27

of his grievance.

¶28

In view of the nature of prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner file such application before respondent no.2 within a period of six weeks from today.

¶29

In the event, such application is filed, respondent no.2 shall look into the matter and dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law after hearing the parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the application.

¶30

Writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid

¶31

directions.

¶32

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶33

shashi/-

¶34

Nawal Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nawal Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Bhuwania and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lakshman Singh @ Laxman Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Smt. Jahanvi Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Asha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Hare Krishna Acharya and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shri Jhula Bihari Ji, Shri Ram Janki Ji, Shri Lakshman Ji, Shri Hanuman Ji Deities Stand In Pakh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.