The High Court dismissed the writ petition due to non-prosecution on the ground that the petitioner was absent from hearings on multiple dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3806 of 2023
======================================================
Lakshman Singh @ Laxman Singh S/o Mahanti Singh
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Addl. Chief Secretary, Deptt. of Revenue & Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar and Ors.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : N O N E For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sajid Salim Khan ( Sc 25 ) Mr.AC to SC-25 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
On repeated call, nobody appears on behalf of petitioner. On last date also i.e. 02.11.2023, nobody appeared on behalf of petitioner. Learned State counsel is present.
prosecution.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay/-
U
Lakshman Singh @ Laxman Singh
The State of Bihar through the Addl. Chief Secretary, Deptt. of Revenue & Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
