On 14-12-2023, the single judge, observing no appearance by the petitioner despite repeated calls, dismissed the writ application for non-prosecution. The learned GP-6 representing the State appeared but did not contest the dismissal.
Writ application dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11610 of 2012
======================================================
MANIK PRASAD MISHRA Son Of Lata Mahadeo Prasad Mishra Resident Of Mohalla - Jyotipuram Colony, Khajpura, Bailey Road, Post Office - B.V. College, Police Station - Shastrinagar, District - Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Ms. Archana Meenakshee, GP-6 Mr. Karandeep Kumar, AC to GP-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
In view of the above, this writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Prakash Narayan U
Manik Prasad Mishra
The State of Bihar and Ors.
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
