The court dismissed the writ application for non-prosecution as the petitioner, despite repeated calls and previous absence, failed to appear while the State was represented.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's non-appearance despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11371 of 2012
======================================================
Mithilesh Kumar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Geeta Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
5 14-12-2023
It appears from the record that on the last occasion, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State was present.
Today also, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.
In such situation, this writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
brajesh/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ application shall be dismissed when the petitioner fails to appear without notice despite repeated calls.
Mithilesh Kumar
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
