The petitioner in a writ jurisdiction case submitted that there is no subsisting grievance. The court dismissed the petition on the ground that it is not pressed.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1159 of 2023
======================================================
Shyam Sundar Prasad @ Priya Ranjan Prasad Son of Shambhu Sharam, Resident of 71/78 Tilha Mahauin Asthan, Tilha Mahavir Asthan Post H.P.Near Dropadi Bhawan, Gaya, District- Gaya (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Mallika Mazumdar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raj Kishore Roy ( GP 18 ) : Mr. Mukul Prasad, AC to GP 18 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
3 03-04-2023
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the
moment, the petitioner is not having any subsisting grievance, hence, the present petition may be disposed off as not pressed.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not
pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
rinkee/- U
Shyam Sundar Prasad @ Priya Ranjan Prasad
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Land Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
The District Magistrate, Gaya.
The Additional District Magistrate, Gaya.
The Land Reform Deputy Collector, Gaya.
The District Public Complaint Redressal Officer, Gaya Sadar, District- Gaya.
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
