Writ petition filed by multiple individuals challenging land-related actions against the State of Bihar. The petition was dismissed due to persistent non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel failed to appear before the High Court.
The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution due to consistent absence of petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11144 of 2019
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Patna High Court CWJC No.11144 of 2019(9) dt.13-10-2023 2/2
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
9 13-10-2023 Petitioner’s counsel is consistently absent.
As such, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Rajiv Roy, J)
N.K/-
U
Vibhash Kumar
Santosh Kumar Chaudhary
The State of Bihar
K. Vinod Chandran
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
