Dismissed
Shatrughan Thakur v. Uma Shankar
Patna HCL.P.A/14/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Letters Patent Appeal dismissed as withdrawn due to the submission that the matter had become infructuous. The court did not entertain the substantive contentions.
What did the court decide?
discontinued due to withdrawal
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.14 of 2020
¶2
In
¶3
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8908 of 2011
¶4
======================================================
¶5
- Shatrughan Thakur son of late Mukhtar Thakur resident of VillageDumaria, Police Station- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj.
¶6
- Ram Narayan Ram son of Shri Nageshwar Ram resident of Village- Alta Hat, PO- Alta Hat, Police Station- Kechadhawan, District- Kishanganj.
¶7
- Shailendra Kumar Singh son of Shri Lawindra Prasad Singh resident of Village- Bagalbari, PO- Alta Hat, Police Station- Kechadhawan, DistrictKishanganj.
¶8
- Md. Kasim son of Md. Imam Ali resident of Village- Phulbari, POTerhagachh, Police Station- Terhagachh, District- Kishanganj.
¶9
- Shambhu Kamti son of Bishwanath Kamti resident of Village- Dumaria, Police Station- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj.
¶10
- Kumari Meera Karn wife of Shri Ravindra Lal Karn resident of VillageBetauna, Police Station- Benipatti, District- Madhubani.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
35 Individual Appellants
- respondent
Uma Shankar Ram
- respondent
State of Bihar
- respondent
Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department
- respondent
Commissioner, Purnia Division
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court