Allowed

Ankit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Apr 2023CR. REV./181/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Dr. Anshuman J. allowed this criminal revision by setting aside the J.J. Board and lower appellate court orders rejecting bail. The court granted bail to the petitioner, a declared juvenile, on his father's undertaking and conditions to meet the probationer officer periodically, applying principles from Lalu Kumar case.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 01.02.2023 impugned is set aside; petitioner directed to be released on undertaking of father and condition to meet Probationer Officer.

Ankit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.181 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2022 Thana- TANDWA District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ankit Kumar Son Of And Under Natural Guardianship Of His Father Santosh Singh Aged About 37 Years Son Of Nagendra Singh R/O Ramnagar @ Ramnagar Tola, Mahuari, P.O.- Karma Lahang, P.S.- Tandwa, DistrictAurangabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-04-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

counsel for the State.

¶14

The present Cr. Revision Application has been filed against the order dated 01.02.2023 passed by learned 1^st Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Cr. Appeal No. 03/2023, arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 52/2022 lodged under Sections 302, 201/34 of the I.P.C., in connection with J.J. Board No. 930 of 2022 (G.R. No. 1193/2022 whereby Cr. Appeal filed by the Accused/Appellant/Petitioner has been dismissed and bail of the petitioner is rejected.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the content of F.I.R., it is crystal clear that name of the petitioner has figured in this case only on suspicion. He submits that there were 3 accused persons whose name has figured in this case. All are juvenile and two of them granted bail by the Co-ordinate

¶16

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.181 of 2023(2) dt.06-04-2023 2/3

¶17

Bench of this court which is Annexure- 5, order dated 03.02.2023 passed in Cr. Revision No. 839 of 2022. Counsel submits that the court below had rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Counsel submits that the petitioner was declared juvenile from J.J.B. and his age was registered as 14 years, 4 months and 13 days. On the alleged date of occurrence i.e. on 01.06.2022. It has also come that due to dispute and difference arises for video game and money transaction, such occurrence took place. It has been mentioned that the petitioner is in remand home since 27.09.2022 whereas this Hon’ble Court in D.B. has decided the fate of many persons in case of Lalu Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (4) PLJR 833.

¶19

In the said judgment, it is categorically hold that the juvenile may be released on three conditions which are as follows:-

¶20

I. The release is likely to bring that person into association with any known criminal.

¶21

II. The release is likely to expose the said person to moral, physical or psychological danger.

¶22

III. The release would defeat the ends of justice.

¶23

Counsel submits that the original bail application

¶24

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.181 of 2023(2) dt.06-04-2023 3/3

¶25

before J.J.B. as well as Appellate application before Appellate Court/ Trial Court has been rejected, is completely ignoring the fundamental principles for juvenile laid down in Section 3 i.e. Presumption of Innocence and Equity.

¶26

In the above stated background and also in the light that father is ready to furnish an undertaking. Petitioner is directed to release on the undertaking of his father as well as condition that on periodical basis, he will meet with Probationer Officer and the order dated 01.02.2023 passed by 1^st Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Cr. Appeal No. 03 of 2023, arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 52 of 2022 and order dated 04.01.2023 passed by J.J.B. No. 930 of 2022 (G.R. No. 1193/2022) is hereby set aside.

¶27

Accordingly, this Cr. Revision Application is hereby

¶28

allowed.

¶29

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶30

prakashmani/-

¶31

U T

Ankit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Sah @ Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sabri Das @ Sabri Kumari Vs the State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Satendra Manjhi @ Sakindra Manjhi @ Satyendra Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar @ Mithai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Farooque Mansoor @ Mohammad Farookh Mansoor Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Prithwi Raj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.